Books
R. Hofmeister Pich, Anselm of Canterbury (1033-1109): Philosophical Theology and Ethics, Brepols, Turnhout 2012.
Papers from the Third International Conference of Medieval Philosophy in Port Alegre, Brazil, 02-04 September 2009.
To notify me of recent publications, forthcoming events or anything of interest to Anselm scholars, please contact me using the form provided:
Friday, 19 October 2012
Monday, 17 September 2012
Recent Publications - September 2012
Books
G.E.M. Gasper & I. Logan (edd), Saint Anselm of Canterbury and His Legacy, Institute of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, Durham University/Pontifical Institute for Medieval Studies, Toronto 2012:
M. Lembke, 'Whatever it is better to be than not to be' in International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. Pre-publication at http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11153-012-9369-y
K.A. Rogers, 'Anselm on the Ontological Status of Choice' in International Philosophical Quarterly, 52 (2012) 183-198.
G.E.M. Gasper & I. Logan (edd), Saint Anselm of Canterbury and His Legacy, Institute of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, Durham University/Pontifical Institute for Medieval Studies, Toronto 2012:
- G.E.M. Gasper & I. Logan, Anselm: A Portrait in Refraction, pp. 1-25
- S. Schenk, Queen Matilda and Anselm's Mary Magdalene, pp. 29-39
- S. Niskanen, The Evolution of Anselm's Letter Collections until ca. 1130, pp. 40-60
- V. Gazeau, From Bec to Canterbury: Between Cloister and the World, the legacy of Anselm, a personne d'autorite, pp. 61-72
- S.N. Vaughn, The Students of Bec in England, pp. 73-91
- J. Diehl, Harmony between Word and World: Anselm of Canterbury, Aelred of Rievaulx and Approaches to Language in Twelfth-Century Monasticism, pp. 95-113
- J. Dunthorne, Anselm and Hugh of St Victor on Freedom and the Will, pp. 114-132
- M. Clavier, "Oro, Deus cognoscam te, amem te, ut gaudeam de te": Rhetorical Theology and the Influence of Anselm on Richard of St Victor, pp. 133-152
- M. Robson, Odo Rigaldi and the Assimilation of St Anselm's Cur Deus homo in the School of the Cordeliers in Paris, pp. 155-173
- B. Goehring, Truth as Rightness in Anselm of Canterbury and Henry of Ghent, pp. 174-202
- J.T. Slotemaker, The Development of Anselm's Trinitarian Theology: The Origins of a Late Medieval Debate, pp. 203-221
- V. Leppin, Praying and Thinking with Anselm: The Tractatus de primo principio of Duns Scotus, pp. 222-235
- M. Healey-Varley, Anselm's Afterlife and the Middle English De custodia interioris hominis, pp. 239-257
- E. Hauwaerts, The Middle English Versions of Saint Anselm of Canterbury's Prayers and Meditations, pp. 258-275
- I. Logan, Was Karl Rahner and Anonymous Anselmian?, pp. 279-298
- B.Goebel, The Myth of the Eleventh Century: Hans Blumenberg's Anselm, pp. 299-317
- E. de Gaal, The Rediscovery of Anselm's Appeal to Beauty in Hans Urs von Balthasar's Theology, pp. 318-340
- G.E.M. Gasper, Tractarian Echoes: Michael Ramsey and the Anglican Responses to Anselm of Canterbury, pp. 341-359
- M.M. Adams, St Anselm on the Goodness of God, pp. 360-384
- E.C. Sweeney, Anselm and the Phenomenology of the Gift in Marcel, Sartre and Marion, pp. 385-404
- S.L. Uckelman, The Reception of Saint Anselm's Logic in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries, pp. 405-426
- M. Lembke, The Cosmontological Argument for the Existence of God, pp. 427-444
M. Lembke, 'Whatever it is better to be than not to be' in International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. Pre-publication at http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11153-012-9369-y
K.A. Rogers, 'Anselm on the Ontological Status of Choice' in International Philosophical Quarterly, 52 (2012) 183-198.
Monday, 4 June 2012
Recent Publications - June 2012
Books
E.C. Sweeney, Anselm of Canterbury and the Desire for the Word, Catholic University of America Press, Washington DC 2012.
Articles
K.A. Rogers, 'Anselm against McCann on God and Sin: Further discussion' in Faith and Philosophy, 28 (2011) 397-415.
M.Sultana, 'Anselm's Argument: On the Unity of Thinking and Being' in New Blackfriars, 93 (2012) pp.276-291.
Reviews
H.J. McCann, 'Review of Katherin Rogers: Anselm on Freedom' in Faith and Philosophy, 28 (2011) 456-459.
E.C. Sweeney, Anselm of Canterbury and the Desire for the Word, Catholic University of America Press, Washington DC 2012.
Articles
K.A. Rogers, 'Anselm against McCann on God and Sin: Further discussion' in Faith and Philosophy, 28 (2011) 397-415.
M.Sultana, 'Anselm's Argument: On the Unity of Thinking and Being' in New Blackfriars, 93 (2012) pp.276-291.
Reviews
H.J. McCann, 'Review of Katherin Rogers: Anselm on Freedom' in Faith and Philosophy, 28 (2011) 456-459.
Friday, 30 March 2012
Coming soon
... Saint Anselm of Canterbury and His Legacy, edited by Giles Gasper and Ian Logan.
Born out of the 2009 Canterbury conference, this volume, published jointly by the Pontifical Institute for Medieval Studies, Toronto, and the Institute of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, Durham University, will be out shortly. It's taken longer than a Hollywood blockbuster to produce, but it will have been worth the wait.
Born out of the 2009 Canterbury conference, this volume, published jointly by the Pontifical Institute for Medieval Studies, Toronto, and the Institute of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, Durham University, will be out shortly. It's taken longer than a Hollywood blockbuster to produce, but it will have been worth the wait.
Friday, 2 March 2012
Recent Publications - March 2012
Books
James McSherry, 'Anselm: In the Steps of the Fathers' in Outreach and Renewal A First-Millennium Legacy for the Third-Millennium Church, Cistercian Studies Series 236, 2011, pp.203-212.
Articles
C.M. Kaufmann, 'New Images for Anselm's Table Talk: an Illustrated manuscript of the Liber De Similitudinibus' in Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 74 (2011) 87-120.
James McSherry, 'Anselm: In the Steps of the Fathers' in Outreach and Renewal A First-Millennium Legacy for the Third-Millennium Church, Cistercian Studies Series 236, 2011, pp.203-212.
Articles
C.M. Kaufmann, 'New Images for Anselm's Table Talk: an Illustrated manuscript of the Liber De Similitudinibus' in Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 74 (2011) 87-120.
Saturday, 29 October 2011
Recent Publications - October 2011 - Updated
Articles
C.I. Barrett, 'A Careful Reading of St. Anselm’s Ontological Argument' in Philosophy and Theology, 23 (2011) 217-230.
C.I. Barrett, 'A Careful Reading of St. Anselm’s Ontological Argument' in Philosophy and Theology, 23 (2011) 217-230.
Saturday, 17 September 2011
Recent Publications - September 2011
Articles
C. Heathwood, 'The relevance of Kant's objection to Anselm's ontological argument' in Religious Studies, 47 (2011) 345-357.
Ian Logan comments: Oops! This paper shifts from (i) Kant's objection undermines Anselm's argument (btw Kant had not read Anselm), to (ii) a plausible reading of Kant's objection undermines Anselm's argument to (iii) a plausible reading of Kant's objection is relevant to at least one popular and defensible reading of Anselm's argument. In fact, as a reading of Anselm it is not defensible (whether or not it is a defensible ontological argument is a different matter). From the very beginning of this article, the author goes astray - misled as are many non-Latinists by the appalling translation of S.N. Deane, so beloved of American philosophers of religion. The motto is 'Read Anselm before you write about him!' Another suggestion is that before you start taking too seriously the notion that 'existence is not a predicate' (or a first order concept/predicate, etc.) you really ought to read Colin McGinn's Logical Properties, in particular the chapter on 'Existence'.
C. Heathwood, 'The relevance of Kant's objection to Anselm's ontological argument' in Religious Studies, 47 (2011) 345-357.
Ian Logan comments: Oops! This paper shifts from (i) Kant's objection undermines Anselm's argument (btw Kant had not read Anselm), to (ii) a plausible reading of Kant's objection undermines Anselm's argument to (iii) a plausible reading of Kant's objection is relevant to at least one popular and defensible reading of Anselm's argument. In fact, as a reading of Anselm it is not defensible (whether or not it is a defensible ontological argument is a different matter). From the very beginning of this article, the author goes astray - misled as are many non-Latinists by the appalling translation of S.N. Deane, so beloved of American philosophers of religion. The motto is 'Read Anselm before you write about him!' Another suggestion is that before you start taking too seriously the notion that 'existence is not a predicate' (or a first order concept/predicate, etc.) you really ought to read Colin McGinn's Logical Properties, in particular the chapter on 'Existence'.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
