tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026842282426898503.post5351273066353978156..comments2021-08-03T21:02:23.412+01:00Comments on The Saint Anselm Blog: Bertrand Russell Interviews St. Anselm of CanterburyIan Loganhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13881479833136425874noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026842282426898503.post-31340252723028253772010-05-04T17:30:20.313+01:002010-05-04T17:30:20.313+01:00Thanks for the reference. I also discuss Russell&#...Thanks for the reference. I also discuss Russell's treatment of arguments such as Anselm's in 'On Denoting' in my book, <i>Reading Anselm's Proslogion</i>. Russell thinks that all Anselm shows is that there is no more than one member of the set of 'that than which nothing greater can be thought'. I think that is correct, but that Anselm also shows that there is at least one such member.Ian Loganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13881479833136425874noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5026842282426898503.post-5064583803149509362010-05-04T12:35:48.548+01:002010-05-04T12:35:48.548+01:00For much on Bertrand Russell and St. Anselm, see G...For much on Bertrand Russell and St. Anselm, see Gregory Landini, "Russell and the Ontological Argument", <i>Russell</i> 29 (2009): 101-28.Kenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09872910075818158600noreply@blogger.com